First, I did not conduct this interview
because I’m not great at thinking of questions to ask. Jennifer Fontaine was the creative
force behind getting this interview to me :) Let’s
check out the interview:
Interview with Lorena
Turner
When did you begin this
series, and what gave you the idea to start?
I began this series
the night before the Los Angeles memorial for Michael Jackson, which was on 7
July 2009. That night there were three Michael Jackson performers on Hollywood
Boulevard, each emphasized something different in their performance or representation
- one was a kind of physical acrobatic dancer in the style of Michael Jackson,
one didn’t dance but was dressed like Michael and accompanied a Madonna
impersonator as if they were on a date in the 1980s, and yet another walked
about shaking hands and receiving condolences and talking as himself though
dressed like Michael.
It became clear to me
that these people weren’t so much honoring Michael Jackson as much as they were
creating a hybrid identity through their representation of him, in other words
they were performing a convergence of their own identity with Michael
Jackson’s, and in doing that they were stand ins for the affection that
people/their audience had for the real performer. At the time this seemed
significant and important, so the next logical step was to find and photograph
as many performers as possible.
As I met and
photographed performers where I live in Los Angeles and New York City, then in
smaller cities around the US, my focus shifted slightly to the idea of Michael
Jackson being an African American performer. I started paying more attention -
through observation and interviews with the people I photographed - to whether
or not race was a significant factor in the performers’ interpretation and
representation of him. This means, Michael Jackson’s career was founded in the
Black Power Movement (the of The Jackson 5 cartoon show as Black Power
Movement-lite), I was curious how his connection to being Black and what that
means in North American culture may have impacted the performers.
The book, “The Michael
Jacksons”, talks a lot about this connection between Michael Jackson and the impersonators
who are currently representing him.
Michael Jackson had such
an extreme look at one point--do you know how exactly some of the impersonators
achieve their hair and makeup?
I think of Michael Jackson's appearance - his make up and costumes - as existing on a spectrum from the early/mid 1970s until his last public appearance in 2009 to announce his “This Is It” series of performances in the UK. The representers (or impersonators) choose within that range how they will look. Most of them make their aesthetic choices based on what album they like best, be it Thriller, Dangerous, or Bad. These are the three albums most performers work with, choose from the most, and find to be the most inspiring. They may mix and match parts of their Michael Jackson character - the hair from the Thriller album era (mid-1980s), with an outfit from Dangerous (1991), or the smooth straight hair Michael Jackson had in the last decade of his life with the white suit he wore on the HIStory tour, which was in 1997. Many performers wear wigs, and then there are others whose natural hair style and color is kept at about shoulder length - long enough to wear in a simple slightly messy pony tail as Michael Jackson did sometimes.
I think of Michael Jackson's appearance - his make up and costumes - as existing on a spectrum from the early/mid 1970s until his last public appearance in 2009 to announce his “This Is It” series of performances in the UK. The representers (or impersonators) choose within that range how they will look. Most of them make their aesthetic choices based on what album they like best, be it Thriller, Dangerous, or Bad. These are the three albums most performers work with, choose from the most, and find to be the most inspiring. They may mix and match parts of their Michael Jackson character - the hair from the Thriller album era (mid-1980s), with an outfit from Dangerous (1991), or the smooth straight hair Michael Jackson had in the last decade of his life with the white suit he wore on the HIStory tour, which was in 1997. Many performers wear wigs, and then there are others whose natural hair style and color is kept at about shoulder length - long enough to wear in a simple slightly messy pony tail as Michael Jackson did sometimes.
Every performer has
their own way they do their make up, again, it’s what the performer sees as
important in their representation as what helps them determine what they will
emphasize with their make up. Some use basic drug store make up, some have
multiple bottles of foundation and blending tools, spending a upwards of two
hours modifying the color and shape of their face, and some don’t even wear
make up. When this happens, the de-emphasizing of appearance in this way, it
forces audiences to believe in the illusion they want to create through the
quality of their dancing.
I'd love to hear a bit
more about the "written ethnography which focuses on the interpretation of
'blackness' by the performers.”
I talked about it a
little in the first answer. My goal in the project became to try to understand
how the performers saw Michael Jackson’s blackness - is this important in what
they highlight or emphasize or even eliminate in their performance of him? Are
the performers aware of, or are they thinking about, his history as it relates
to Civil Rights? Are they aware of how significant it was for him to be one of
the first black performers played on heavy rotation on MTV? What is the connection
between Michael Jackson and the history of minstrelsy in the US?
The book explores
these questions, it seeks to trace Michael Jackson’s history as a performer as
a way of linking to the representers. Where was he in his career when they first
saw him? How much or how little of his history did they know when they first
saw his explosive performances? The Michael Jackson that I know as someone who
listened to and watched him in the 1970s and 80s, is much different than
someone who came to him for the first time in the 1990s, or even 2000s. This is
part of what is explored in the written part of the book.
I also look at how the
performers construct their MJ character, what they use, where they get it, why
they blend eras together, and then how the impersonator culture ‘works’ - what,
say, is the difference in the representation that happens on Hollywood
Boulevard vs. a show in Las Vegas. AND there are long pieces dedicated to
telling the story of three different performers who have vastly different
experiences as their Michael Jackson - Scooby (who goes by the name MJ.5 now)
at a back yard birthday party in New York City, another Jovan Rameau, a Haitian
immigrant who came to the US in the late 80s and gravitated to performing as
Michael because, a) he naturally looks like him, and b) because he saw Michael
Jackson as a black man who had a lot of respect. He works primarily on
Hollywood Boulevard, where he gets a lot of notice. There is also a section
about Jennifer Amerson, a Caucasian mother of two who lives in Florence, South
Carolina, who performs for, primarily, African American audiences at birthday
parties, reunions and small celebrations around where she lives.
In what way/s were you
surprised by the impersonator's motivations?
The impersonators do
their work as Michael Jackson for a variety of reasons – some because they have
a talent dancing in a style that is similar to his, some because bare a natural
resemblance to him, and some because they see that portraying Michael Jackson
in a professional way (meaning one that involved the receipt of money for their
performance) as an opportunity to build their own brand as a
singer/dancer/performer. But surprised me the most about looking at the people
who represent Michael Jackson professionally is how invested the audience is in
them - how much genuine love and affection the representers’ audiences have for
them, and, in turn, how that affection keeps the representers dedicated to what
they do.
What is one unifying
theme among this community?
Looking again at the
performances of the impersonators, or representers – when they are performing,
either in public or in private paid events, there are these incredible moments
of exchange between them and their audiences. It’s a very pure experience for
both. All of that story that became Michael Jackson’s story, everything that
came to surround him in the last 15 or so years of his life, well, it’s just
gone. No one talks about the molestation charges, the trials, the changes in
his appearance, his marriages, his children, his extended family, his financial
troubles, etc. etc. There’s just the expression of a genuine appreciation for
Michael Jackson. I didn’t meet one performer who didn’t genuinely respect
him.
Is
money one of the great motivators for the impersonators, or is it the love of
Michael Jackson?
It’s a little bit of
both in most cases. I think the impersonators see their affection for Michael
Jackson as an avenue to unite those feelings with a way to make a living. From
the outside, from our perspective, it probably seems unfathomable that that can
be a way to make a living, or a name for oneself, but it’s real for them, they
do it, and with success. Varying degrees of success – sometimes it’s financial,
Jovan Rameau who is a look alike on Hollywood Boulevard can make between $400 –
500 a day posing for pictures with tourists at about $5 a pop, and sometimes
it’s to gain experience in the entertainment world as a manager (I’m thinking of
MJ.5 (Scooby) who books and manages his career as a Michael Jackson tribute
artist, and sometimes, and this is just my own observation, no impersonator
told me this directly, it’s to stay suspended in that kind of affection for
Michael Jackson. In other words, it allows certain performers to stay connected
to Michael Jackson in a way that is validated by the people in front of who
they perform.
Do
the various impersonators try to also embody Michael Jackson’s worldview as a
part of their lifestyle?
Many of them see
Michael Jackson as a great humanitarian, someone who was concerned about
human’s impact on the environment, about race relations, and about children. I
can think of a few impersonators who have built their local reputation, which I
guess you could call their career since they are performing locally, on this
kind of thoughtfulness. Jen Amerson, who performs in eastern South Carolina,
returns the dance floor after her performances to pose with every person (and
usually this means children) who wants to have a photo with her. Mjx Jackson, a
performer in New Jersey holds classes where he teaches kids how to dance in the
Michael Jackson style. He does this while dressed as Michael Jackson, which
adds to his mystique. Even the way they communicate on social media, by ending
a post with “Much MJ LOVE”, or something similar, signals an encompassing of
what they perceive to be the values he projected to the public.
In your
research, did you witness any episodes where race was an issue between one of
the tribute artists and their audience?
It’s funny, when I
surveyed the impersonators and tribute artists most of them said there was no
issue with them being of a certain race – that may or may not have been Michael
Jackson’s, but when I observed a couple of them interacting with audiences, or
spent time asking questions in an extended interview context, it was clear that
there were some issues there. I never saw incidents where an audience or
audience member made a comment about a performer’s race, but one performer,
Jovan Rameau said that he frequently hears comments when he’s on Hollywood
Boulevard, things directed at him about his skin color being too dark to stand
in for Michael Jackson.
What do you hope this book
adds to the already massive #MJ culture?
Michael Jackson has been gone for almost five
years. The last few years of his life weren’t his best in terms of maintaining
a positive public reputation and creative output. There was so much conjecture
and rumor that swirled around him, in fact one of the impersonators told me
that in the last few years of Michael Jackson’s life he was not hired often for
private parties, and when it was it was as a joke. But with his death, as we’ve
seen when other artists and performers die, the value of his artistic
contribution has been, and is being reevaluated. Glee, American Idol and
America’s Next Top Model have all air episodes centered around Michael
Jackson’s songs and look; Phillip Tracey, and Irish designer recently used him
as the inspiration for a line of head wear. It’s very exciting to see his work
being appraised at different cultural levels.
“The Michael Jacksons”
isn’t really a celebration of fandom, though there are aspects of that in the
story, it’s instead it offers a possibility for understanding yet another
aspect of the impact of Michael Jackson – his ability to remove race from
performance in popular music. I’m not saying he did this completely in his own
work, nor, perhaps, was that his intention, but when talking with the
impersonators and tribute artists that are currently working in his image, it’s
clear that Michael Jackson was a figure who transcended contemporary notions of
racial categorization and, in most cases, has allowed for the performers to do
the same.
Anything
else important to know?
“The Michael Jacksons” consists of about 100 pages of analysis and story telling, and 35 portraits of performers working at all levels around the US. It is being pre-sold on our website, www.themichaeljacksons.com, this means that we are working within a publishing model where we need to sell a number of copies of the book in order to print it. We will sell this way through 15 February 2014, then, when we reach our goal, we’ll release the book in May 2014, just in time for the fifth anniversary of Michael Jackson’s death this June.
About the Author: LORENA
TURNER teaches photography in the Communication Department at
California State Polytechnic University to budding journalists, artists and
anthropologists. Lorena has been working on The Michael Jacksons since June of
2009 with the objective of uniting photographic documentary production
methodologies with sociological research practices. She lives in Los Angeles
and New York City.
ABOUT THE PROJECT
Michael Jackson died in Los Angeles on June
25, 2009. Since then his popularity as a figure of representation has soared
and a kind of sub-culture has emerged that both celebrates and builds upon his
artistic accomplishments. Michael Jackson representers (tribute artists,
impersonators and look-alikes) are both male and female, and come from multiple
age groups, races and socio-economic backgrounds. They hail from large cities,
suburban sprawl and small rural settings. To them, Michael Jackson is a
lifestyle and a place to focus both their personal and professional
aspirations.
The Michael
Jacksons is both a monograph, featuring over 35 MJ representers who live and
work around the US, and an ethnography that seeks to deconstruct and understand
the motivations of these fascinating people.
Featured representers:
Devra Gregory (DEV as MJ), Scorpio, Apple G. Jackson (Brandon Hunt), Jovan
Rameau, The Prince of Pop (Omar Rajpute), Sean Vezina, JenNjuice4MJ (Jen
Amerson), Aamir Smith, Agent M (Mario Coleman), Derrian Tolden, J Michael
Lucas, Bobby Wolfey, Hollywood MJ (Christof), Mikette (Dominique Wilson), La
Quinton Holiday, Lorenzo Coleman, Prince Michael, Maxx, MJ of NOLA, MJs Raven
(Crystal Pullen), Mjx Expressions, Santana Jackson, MJ.5 (Charles
"Scooby" James), Shari Wilson and Ian Smith
Blurb: A
book of portraits, stories, and analysis of
Michael Jackson tribute artists and impersonators
who live and work in the United States.
Michael Jackson tribute artists and impersonators
who live and work in the United States.
Links:
Order by Feb 1, 2014 to receive a 15% Discount
Order here!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment